Strongly disagreed. I use maxwarn all the time. If it was a hidden
option, how would I have ever known about it? Further, if it was a
hidden option, then developers would need to be very careful about
throwing warnings only in the most dire situations because the general
user would not know how to circumvent them. This is also not optimal.
There are many things that one is capable of doing with gromacs that
are incorrect (e.g. coupling ions to their own temperature coupling
group). But there is no need to make all of these things hidden
options. As you stated, there are lots of things in gromacs that
really should not be used unless one knows the exact consequences of
doing so.
Chris.
-- original message --
I would be a fan of making -maxwarn a hidden option; it really should
not be used unless one knows the exact consequences of doing so.
Agreed.
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
