Again, *please keep all Gromacs-related correspondence on the mailing list* The type of information that you have posted is important to share with others who may know how to help. I do not know the answer to your problem. I would suggest contacting the list again with the following information:

1. The relevant contents of your .mdp file(s)
2. What each figure in your image represents (main image vs. inset)

-Justin

Eudes Fileti wrote:
Justin thanks for the reply. Sorry, 160000 refers to the value of dg / dl for lambda = 0. I am sending you a link for you see the profile of the curve.
http://cromo.ufabc.edu.br/~fileti/web/dgdl-transfer2.jpg
This case is for solute in benzene. The peak in lambda=0 is around 30000.
For sc-power=1 I got a peak much higher than for sc-power=2, and therefore the integration in this case (sc-power=1) could lead me to a much greater error. In both cases (ethanol and benzene) the curves coincide for values of lambda beyond 0.4.
bests
eef

P.S.: I am using the 3.3.3 version.

_______________________________________
Eudes Eterno Fileti
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas
Universidade Federal do ABC
Rua Santa Adélia, 166 - Bloco B, Sala 1048
09210-170  Santo André - SP Brasil
+55.11.4437-8408
skype: eefileti
http://cromo.ufabc.edu.br/~fileti/


On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu <mailto:jalem...@vt.edu>> wrote:



    Eudes Fileti wrote:

        Hello Justin, I am facing a very similar problem to that you
        experienced and described in
        (http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2008-February/032429.html).

        I throw this question in the GMX forum and Berk has kindly
        helped me. But reading the forum I realized that you already
        could be solved the problem so that maybe I could help more
        directly.


    Please keep Gromacs-related discussions on the list.  If you had
    followed the rest of the thread you reference, you will find that my
    calculations were falling victim to a bug in Gromacs-3.3.1.  If you
    are using a newer version, then my situation is not applicable,
    since the problem has been fixed (IIRC) as of Gromacs-3.3.3.

    If you are using version 3.3.1, re-run your simulations with a newer
    version.


        I have tried to calculate the free energy of transfer from
        benzene to ethanol
        for a polyhydroxylated (24 OH's). This system has 24 hydroxyl
        groups, and in ethanol, there should be more than 20
        solute-solvent hydrogen bonds being erased simultaneously (not
        to mention the possible intramolecular HB's).

        The Dg/dlambda plot, for both, benzene and ethanol shows a very
        high and narrow peak near lambda=0. In the case of ethanol is
        worse due to the solute-solvent hydrogen bonds.
        I performed two sets of simulations, one for sc-power=1 and
        another for sc-power=2, using the following protocol:

        1) I made disappear the electrostatic interactions turning off
        the charges (by 200ps), 2) At the sequence I made disappear the
        LJ interactions (for more 200ps) 3) Finally I performed a run of
        0.5ns.
        Correct me i this procedure is inappropriate.

        To start, Berk said me that the use of sc-power=2 never is
        recommended. Ok!
        Secondly, then he gave me a good tip that I was not taking into
        account:
        Disappear the electrostatic interactions using hard-core instead
        soft-core.
        I did this and actually work (only in part).

        When I used softcore to desappear the electrostatic interations,
        the value of dg/dlambda for lambda = 0 was ~160000. Following
        the tip of Berk, wiht hardcore I got ~2000!


    Right, you should only need soft-core for the LJ component.


        However when I needed to use softcore again, now to remove the
        LJ interactions, the value returned back to ~160000.`


    I don't understand what you mean.  Is the total area under the curve
    160000? That is ridiculously high.

    I don't know that I have the expertise to help you much more.  I am
    not entirely familiar with your methodology.  What I have done in my
    own work is run 21 independent simulations at lambda points between
    0 and 1 (5 ns each after equilibration), and integrated the
    resulting curve.  None of my dV/dl points ever approached that
    magnitude, but I can't comment on your specific case, because I
    don't know what you're doing.

    -Justin


        Could you gimme some insigths to solve this problem?
        Best
        eef

        P.S.: You can solve your problem of polyphenolic compound?

        _______________________________________
        Eudes Eterno Fileti
        Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas
        Universidade Federal do ABC
        Rua Santa Adélia, 166 - Bloco B, Sala 1048
        09210-170  Santo André - SP Brasil
        +55.11.4437-8408
        skype: eefileti
        http://cromo.ufabc.edu.br/~fileti/


-- ========================================

    Justin A. Lemkul
    Graduate Research Assistant
    ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
    Department of Biochemistry
    Virginia Tech
    Blacksburg, VA
    jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> | (540) 231-9080
    http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

    ========================================



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to