That sounds good, but I'm not sure if it is enough.
Agreed. I'll recompile and start from previous checkpoints.

Did you select "Closed bugs" as well?
ouch! You're right, thanks for the tip.

The error is mentioned here:
http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108
and http://www.bionmr.com/board/showthread.php?p=198

I still don't know exactly what the problem was, but since I have already decided to redo these runs I have lost my interest in that exact information.

As an aside: bug 108 did not show up on a search for gcc, although it clearly contains the word. The search returned bugs 141 and 102 -- both relevant, but why it does not also return 108 is unclear

It would indeed be great if we could do more exhaustive tests at compile
time...
Agreed. In my case, I knew the issues and just installed without thinking enough. The tests are most important for new users I think.

Thanks Again,
Chris.


_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to