Dear Mark & Chris,

Thanks a lot for your help.

As both of you suggested I have increased the tolerence limit of the bond (using VMD, as described by Chris), after increasing the Dynamic bond lenth, the structure looks fine. So it means that during mimimization, position of water hydrogens are moved further to their ideal limit. So what could be the possible reason for that? Is this the problem of my initial structure or that of mimimization parameters (em.mdp)? what do you think about my plots from md_run data? Do they look fine or that could be the root of the problem?

After having checked again I see that I had not got any LINCE warning for protein atoms. I had got for water molecules only. As per your concern about the algoritham, possibly this could be due to the report of first few N LINCE warnings only. I am posting this issue to the developer also, But my personnel opinion is that this may not be the case because in tpr file protein comes first followed with water, so if there is any chiral inversion or LINCE ERROR in protein it should have been reported first (Correct me if I am wrong).

I was getting LINCE warning in first equilibration run and not in minimization.

about " comm_grps = Protein_POP SOL " that was suggested by Dr. Xavier some time ago.
http://www.gromacs.org/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,165/

I will also try " comm_grps =  system" and come back to you.

Thanks again for your precious help.

Regards,
Alok

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:29 AM
Subject: [gmx-users] Weird structure after minimization (membrane proteinsimulation


>Dear All,
>
>I am doing the simulation of POPE lipid + Protein, I did my system
setup using mdrun_hole program. It looks fine to me http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj58/gromacs/all-three_final.gif (Figure-A). When I was doing energy minimization (using steepest decent and conjugant gradient algorithm), water molecules diffuse a lot, structure looks very weird (Figure-B). But only after 1ps mdrun (NVT ensemble) it comes back to its normal (Figure-C). But during this 1ps I got lots of LINCE warning, all for water molecules. If I continue my simulation (till now ~5ns production run) I do not get any problem/warning.
>
>So I just want to know should I proceed further, or I have to come
back to my initial state and resolve this problem?
>Previously I tried different options by changing value of emtol but I
could not resolve this problem. So I proceeded. By this mail, I am requesting expert comments from you people. Is it normal to Membrane simulation or there is some problem in my system? Till now I have not encountered any problems/warning.
>
>Eagerly waiting for your reply,
>
>Best regards,
>Alok Jain
>
>
>@Mark:
>Thanks a lot for your reply/comments and time. I am using TIP4P water
model, and I really could not understand why it happens, Some of the bonds of the water molecules are broken down, and after 1ps MD they make bonds again. Is it not very strange? I have tried to visualize in different visualization tool but still problem was persisting. I was not able to implement your suggestion regarding tolerance limit of the visualization software, I used rasmol, chimera, insightII but could not found any such option. I am still trying for that, if I could found it, I will inform you the result after that. I am really worried about temporary LINCE warning
>which I was getting. Is there any way to resolve this issue?

Use VMD and set your representation to "dynamic bonds", then there is a sliding bar that determines how to detect bonds. Easier yet, load your initial (presumable ok) structure from figure A into VMD, then load in the figure B structure as a new frame in the original structure. This will draw the representation of fig B using the topology as determined from fig A.

>
>I am pasting the em.mdp and my top file below.
>
>@chris: Thanks for your time spent on investigating on my problem.
Thanks for creating the public album. I am sorry to say I could not get your statement "In the worst case scenario that I can imagine, temporary lincs warning could represent a chiral inversion that will never be resolved and never give you any more warning messages, but would definitely give you the wrong answer." could you please explain it a little more (in layman term) because as I think there is no Chiral center in water so what it
>means by chiral inversion.

Yes, water has no chiral center. But your protein does. In the midst of all those LINCS warnings, you might have had one about your protein, and it is even possible that only the first N LINCS errors are reported (you could ask a developer about that) so possibly you have protein angles rotating
too much during minimization steps without knowing it.

Regarding what I mean by a chiral inversion... If forces get too high in EM, it is entirely possible that totally unphysical things can happen. To give an MD example, a long time ago (using CHARMM) I was doing simulated annealing and taking my structure up to 5000K. At that temperature, I had some strange rearrangements where the Ca of a Trp had a "chiral inversion" (perhaps not the correct term?) in which my L-Trp became D-Trp. Then upon cooling, the molecule no longer had enough energy to overcome this L to D barrier of the improper and note that impropers do not enforce L amino acids, they just hinder L->D or D->L conversions.

>I have also plotted the two plots to validate my final structure of
mdrun_hole program and uploaded these plots at http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj58/gromacs/hole-depth-atom1.jpg As I pasted below my em.mdp file. I was using FLEXIBLE TIP4P water molecules.
>
>
>
>
>em.mdp
>----------
>
>define              =  -DFLEXIBLE
>constraints         =  none
>integrator          =  steep
>nsteps              =  10000
>;
>;       Energy minimizing stuff
>;
>emtol                    =  100
>emstep                 =  0.001
>nstcgsteep           =  1000
>
>comm_mode      =  Linear
>nstcomm             =  1
>comm_grps        =  Protein_POP SOL
>ns_type               =  grid
>rlist                       =  0.9
>coulombtype       =  PME
>rcoulomb             =  0.9
>vdw-type              =  Cut-off
>rvdw                     =  1.2
>fourierspacing     =  0.12
>pme_order          =  4
>ewald_rtol            =  1e-5
>optimize_fft         =  yes
>Tcoupl                 =  no
>Pcoupl                 =  no
>gen_vel               =  no
>
>

Are you sure about "comm_grps        =  Protein_POP SOL" ??
Try with "comm_grps = System"

Chris.


>
>top file:
>--------------
>
>; Include forcefield parameters
>#include "/home/lysine/ffoplsaa.itp"
>
>; Include chain topologies
>#include "Protein_A.itp"
>#include "Protein_B.itp"
>#include "Protein_C.itp"
>#include "Protein_D.itp"
>
>#include "pope_opls.itp"
>
>; Include water topology
>#include "tip4p.itp"
>
>
>#ifdef POSRES_WATER
>; Position restraint for each water oxygen
>[ position_restraints ]
>;  i funct       fcx        fcy        fcz
>   1    1       10000      10000       10000
>#endif
>
>; Include generic topology for ions
>#include "ions.itp"
>
>[ system ]
>; Name
>protein + POPE +  TIP4P water molecules
>
>[ molecules ]
>; Compound        #mols
>Protein_A           1
>Protein_B           1
>Protein_C           1
>Protein_D           1
>POPE               269
>SOL              13800
>
>

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to