Hi,
On Aug 29, 2006, at 10:09 PM, David van der Spoel wrote:
I would also note that when I follow this procedure, but replace
"release-3-1-patches" with "release-3-3-patches", I get something
that
compiles with no problems.
A further clarification request: does release-3-3-patches get me
3.3, or 3.3.1?
We fork the source in CVS every time we make a new major release
(3.3). In principle, the release-3-3-patches branch should only get
bugfixes after that, and periodically we create new point releases
and put them on the site.
This also means that it should be _fairly_ safe to run directly from
the release branch of CVS, since it is usually more bugfree than the
latest point release, and we shouldn't introduce things that require
us to redo all the tests before a major release.
No rule without exception, though. Sometimes we've added
functionality in point releases, but that's a bad habit we're trying
to break...
Cheers,
Erik
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
