Zack, no need to disable gmail spam detection, you just create filter with 
the code: "is:spam". Then you set to not send to spam folder. Very simple.



On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:00:13 PM UTC-2, Zack Tennant wrote:
>
> Easy enough to code, but you're looking for a service that no e-mail 
> provider I know of provides, but there are people who provide that type of 
> service.
>
> When you tell your e-mail provider (in this case, Google) to not mark a 
> message as spam, you're effectively turning off their spam detection.  If 
> they're no longer detecting, then how could they mark.  There are online 
> e-mail inspection sites that could receive your message and give it a spam 
> score, but then you'd still need a way for that score to be delivered to 
> you without your mail carrier using their spam filter, or that score, to 
> move it out of your inbox.
>
> The most effective way I could imagine would be to let your carrier do 
> their own spam filtering, and use a protocol that recognizes folders, so 
> you can pull the messages that they've marked.  I've already suggested 
> this, but as you pointed out, you've rejected this option prior to even 
> posting.
>
> The only way I can see you using a 26 year old protocol (RFC 1081) that 
> was designed only for downloading messages in a single mailbox, is to 
> disable your online mail provider's detection so it's all in one box 
> (you've already done this), and do 100% of your spam detection on your 
> client.  This is possible to have SMTP servers submit messages to online 
> evaluators who will give you back a score, but it's still 100% on your 
> client to determine if it's spam, Google's detectors have already been 
> disabled by your process.  SpamAssassin is one such evaluator.
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Fernando Scussel <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Marko, to me doesn't matter if it's in the subject or in the header, like 
>> you've said (i didn't know it was possible). As far as there's a mark that 
>> the email client can recognize, all they would have to do is write a code 
>> that would detect that mark and put the messages in the spam folder. Very 
>> easy to code indeed. But as far as I know, there's nothing like that in the 
>> market.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 4:22:40 PM UTC-2, vukko wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this has anything to do with IMAP.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If one is going to use a protocol that is designed so that all message 
>>> filtering is done on the local PC and not on the server, i.e. POP3, then 
>>> one must expect to have to manage Spam filtering there also.​
>>>
>>> ​I wouldn't want Google to modify my messages, especially the false 
>>> positives (Spam) other than perhaps adding a spam score in the headers e.g. 
>>> something like X-Gmail-Spam-Score: but certainly not the subject.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Marko
>>>
>>>   -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Gmail-Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gmail-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Gmail-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gmail-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to