Le 15/12/2009 22:35, Erich Iseli a écrit :
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:42:52 +0100, MoYo<[email protected]>  wrote:
Le 15/12/2009 20:33, Erich Iseli a écrit :
Hello everybody,

Yesterday, I tried to understand the meaning of the following ticket:
https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/show/1650

Hi,

This tickets is about recursive items which could be reservable (ex.
network equipment / printer / software).
Computers could be for the moment recursive.

Idea it to permit user in sub-entities to make a reservation of a
recursive item.
What do you mean with "Computers could be for the moment recursive"?

Sorry, really not understandable.
Computers are not recursive for the moment. So reservation of them can not be recursive too.

For the printers, I just made a test and it worked, both for the
recursivity (I hadn't noticed the "sub-entities" drop-down so far) _but
also for the reservation_! What I did is create the printer in the parent
entity, declare it as available to subentities, declare it as a reservable
item, then logged in as a user of the subentity and I was able to both see
the printer, and do a reservation for it! I was also able to see
- in the subentity reservations done in the parent entity
- in the parent entity reservations done in the subentity

Great.

So I now start to wonder what functionality this ticket is really about...

And then, what is the difference between a printer and a computer? Why is
a printer recursive and a computer not? I don't know how other entities
work, but we have big printers which tend to stay at the same place and are
just used by the users, while we have laptop computers which can be
reserved and used for a meeting for example. Having computers recursive
would really be of a help if an employee from subentity "A" visits
subentity "B" and needs a laptop computer for a presentation. In that case,
that computer would just have to be set up in the common parent entity of
"A" and "B".

Juste because it was not done.
Priority for seting up recursive items was networkequipment and printers.

A bientot,

Erich aka ricky_ds

P.S. I could write in French as well, but I've seen the usage on this ML
is rather to write in English. But feel free to tell me otherwise :)
Both is possible. But english is read by more people.

Regards
_______________________________________________
Glpi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev

Reply via email to