Тарас Савчук a e'crit :
>
The complete answer :)

> I'm very interested in implementing:
>
> --- Email integration ---
>
> 1) Good email parser both for HTML and plain text messages (no 
> problems with missing/added new line characters, no encoding 
> problems). Some of problems was discussed here - 
> http://www.glpi-project.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=12378
>
A ticket is planned for tha 0.80 version : 
https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/show/1142
We have several libraires to test.
If you want to test them you are welcome.

> 2) Templates for messages with sensible lightweight defaults (we can 
> learn from Zendesk here). For example, there is no need to send all 
> ticket body to user -- we can simple send message with "You ticket 
> with subject <message Subject> received. Ticket number is #. Our 
> technician will be working on it shortly".
>
This is an already planned ticket : 
https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/show/848
Now it was planned for the 0.95 version but may be moved to the 0.80.
We have several contributions (see in user wiki) and must work on it.

> 3) Ability to assign messages from existing in GLPI users to user & to 
> entity user belongs to.
>
Could you explain more that you mean ?

> 4) Accurate reminders to tech support about unassigned tickets.
>
What do you mean exactly ?

> --- Tickets ---
>
> 1) Separation of tickets & tasks (it's done in Zendesk). Tickets are 
> subject of SLA, tickets need to be resolved/assigned quickly. Tasks 
> may have one important field -- due date (or due date + start date). 
> Task can be open in GLPI for any amount of time, it's not subject of 
> SLA and viewing of tasks can be easily separated from viewing of tickets.
>
All these features are already planned :
SLA : https://forge.indepnet.net/wiki/glpi/GlpiSla
Review Ticket Usage : 
https://forge.indepnet.net/wiki/glpi/RefonteAffichageTicket with mockups

> 2) Time management improvements. Now planned ticket time = t(planned 
> finish) -- t(planned start). It's completely senseless: or we don't 
> use planning or we can't count time correctly. We must be able to 
> input spent time manually or planning can only be used with tasks 
> (tickets by nature need short-term actions).
>
You could see a mockup here : 
https://forge.indepnet.net/attachments/15/Taches.png

> 3) Predefined/configured filters for tickets, i.e. with one click we 
> must be able to view "today tickets", "this week tickets", "unassigned 
> tickets", "my tasks"... Big filter panel can be completely hidden.
>

You could already use bookmarks to do such a think.
Search Engine for tickets will be changed : 
https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/show/1123

> --- Documentation ---
>
> 1) Per-entity wiki for collaborative work on entity's documentation.
>
I do not think what the aim of GLPI is to include a wiki system.
>
> I consider to allocate some financial help for improvements to be done 
> in such/similar directions :)
>
> As I understand, Denis Linvinus are thinking in similar way.
>
For 0.80 features which are already planned, donations to the project 
will speed up the development.

Regards

Julien Dombre


_______________________________________________
Glpi-dev mailing list
Glpi-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev

Reply via email to