blaginin commented on code in PR #16617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16617#discussion_r2176061502


##########
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/test_utils.rs:
##########
@@ -629,25 +622,15 @@ pub fn build_group_by(input_schema: &SchemaRef, columns: 
Vec<String>) -> Physica
     PhysicalGroupBy::new_single(group_by_expr.clone())
 }
 
-pub fn assert_plan_matches_expected(
-    plan: &Arc<dyn ExecutionPlan>,
-    expected: &[&str],
-) -> Result<()> {
-    let expected_lines: Vec<&str> = expected.to_vec();
+pub fn plan_matches_expected(plan: &Arc<dyn ExecutionPlan>) -> Result<String> {

Review Comment:
   from this name you'd expect that it checks that the plan matches but it does 
not. should we call it `get_optimized_plan`?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to