pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2981329400

   @alamb the remaining open question I have related to this PR is what the 
default implementation should be for the time being. Do we use the tokio 
`has_budget_remaining`/`consume_budget` approximation which is more robust or 
do we stick with the per-operator counter we have on `main` but which doesn't 
fix the interleave test case (marked as `ignore` to not fail the build)?
   
   The current state of the PR uses the latter unless you compile with `--cfg 
datafusion_coop=tokio_fallback`.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to