Kontinuation commented on PR #1511: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1511#issuecomment-2743369835
> Dumb question: is `take_record_batch` an option here (it looks like interleave can actually coalesce a vector of `RecordBatch`. What would the performance implication be of `take` vs. `interleave`? The `take_record_batch` function is likely to result in numerous small memory allocations for each input batch, which may lead to poorer performance compared to `interleave_record_batch`. However, it's essential to prototype both implementations to fully comprehend their performance characteristics. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
