alamb commented on issue #15111: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15111#issuecomment-2722629911
> Currently, the datasource crate depends on physical-plan, meaning that physical-plan cannot access datasource at all. This design seems strange because none of the physical-plan code can directly access real datasource execution plans, while all datasources have access to all physical plans (while just needing the trait definitons). In my opinion, the datasources should not need access to physical-plans ( I am not sure if this is the same as @jayzhan211 ). Maybe we could remove that dependency? @berkaysynnada is there any particular problem (like you are trying to implement some feature that you can not) you are trying to solve with this ticket? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
