Dandandan commented on code in PR #14593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14593#discussion_r1951334920


##########
datafusion/functions/src/datetime/date_trunc.rs:
##########
@@ -185,10 +185,10 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for DateTruncFunc {
         ) -> Result<ColumnarValue> {
             let parsed_tz = parse_tz(tz_opt)?;
             let array = as_primitive_array::<T>(array)?;
-            let array = array
-                .iter()
-                .map(|x| general_date_trunc(T::UNIT, &x, parsed_tz, 
granularity.as_str()))
-                .collect::<Result<PrimitiveArray<T>>>()?
+            let array: PrimitiveArray<T> = array
+                .try_unary(|x| {
+                    general_date_trunc(T::UNIT, x, parsed_tz, 
granularity.as_str())

Review Comment:
   looking at the code, I think even more could be gained by having 
`general_date_trunc` operate on the array rather than per value.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to