andygrove opened a new pull request, #1380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1380

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1345
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   Refactor in preparation for improving type checking and testing for 
aggregate expressions.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   Move aggregate expression serde into individual classes
   
   This is mostly just moving code around. There are only two functional 
changes:
   
   1. Previously, we had match arms such as `case max @ Max(child) if 
minMaxDataTypeSupported(max.dataType) =>` which meant that if the type was not 
supported then we would fall through to the `case _` arm which would report 
`unsupported Spark aggregate function`, which is misleading. We now do the type 
checks withing the aggregate serde logic and report `unsupported data type` for 
the aggregate instead.
   2. I made some small changes to the type checks because the existing code 
checked for `NumericType` rather than the specific types that we actually 
support, so I made this more explicit. We do not support `FractionalType`, for 
example, and this is a child of `NumericType`.
   
   ## How are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   3. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Existing tests.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to