wiedld commented on code in PR #13986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13986#discussion_r1914317566


##########
datafusion/physical-plan/src/execution_plan.rs:
##########
@@ -110,6 +110,16 @@ pub trait ExecutionPlan: Debug + DisplayAs + Send + Sync {
     /// trait, which is implemented for all `ExecutionPlan`s.
     fn properties(&self) -> &PlanProperties;
 
+    /// Returns an error if this individual node does not conform to its 
invariants.
+    /// These invariants are typically only checked in debug mode.
+    ///
+    /// A default set of invariants is provided in the default implementation.
+    /// Extension nodes can provide their own invariants.
+    fn check_node_invariants(&self) -> Result<()> {
+        // TODO

Review Comment:
   > Some rules only take in valid plans and output valid plans (e.g. 
ProjectionPushdown). These are typically applied at later stages in the 
optimization/plan construction process
   
   When running our current sqllogic test suite, I found that most rules were 
passing through the same validity of plan. For example, the 
`ProjectionPushdown` usually had an "unexecutable" plan (due to an early 
OutputRequirements rule output) and the  pushdown rule itself did not change 
the validity.
   
   That is what the default impl behavior of the 
`PhysicalOptimizerRule::executable_check` is to pass through the current plan 
validity expectation.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to