alamb commented on PR #14083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14083#issuecomment-2585346810

   > I don't like that datafusion-physical-optimizer needs to use datafusion 
crate as a dev-dependency. 
   
   Thanks @mnpw -- I agree this is not good and we shouldn't merge it in like 
that (and in fact I think it failed the circular dependency check)
   
   I think one of the major sources of this dependency is the use of 
`ParquetExec` which is still defined in the core module...
   
   
   Since `datafusion` already depends on `phsyical-optimizer`, what would you 
think about moving as many of the physical optimizer utils from 
   * 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/test_utils.rs
   To
   * 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/test_utils.rs
 
   As possible?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to