jonahgao commented on code in PR #13902:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13902#discussion_r1897221740
##########
datafusion/sqllogictest/bin/sqllogictests.rs:
##########
@@ -40,19 +40,25 @@ pub fn main() -> Result<()> {
.block_on(run_tests())
}
-fn value_validator(actual: &[Vec<String>], expected: &[String]) -> bool {
- let expected = expected
- .iter()
- // Trailing whitespace from lines in SLT will typically be removed,
but do not fail if it is not
- // If particular test wants to cover trailing whitespace on a value,
- // it should project additional non-whitespace column on the right.
- .map(|s| s.trim_end().to_owned())
- .collect::<Vec<_>>();
+#[allow(clippy::ptr_arg)]
+fn normalizer(s: &String) -> String {
+ // Trailing whitespace from lines in SLT will typically be removed, but do
not fail if it is not
+ // If particular test wants to cover trailing whitespace on a value,
+ // it should project additional non-whitespace column on the right.
+ s.trim_end().to_owned()
+}
+
+fn value_validator(
+ normalizer: Normalizer,
Review Comment:
Not related to this PR, I'm a bit confused about why sqllogictests need a
`Normalizer`🤔
The value validator can already be customized, and specifically, the
validator will call the normalizer within its proces. `Normalizer` seems like
an unnecessary design to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
