stuhood commented on issue #25483: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25483#issuecomment-5766489785
> [@stuhood](https://github.com/stuhood) Makes sense. I think the only situation that happens is in joins, which I tried to cover in [this comment](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25483#issuecomment-5735805577). Ie. 2 differently range partitioned inputs or 1 range partitioned input + 1 unpartitioned input. Yea. I guess that I just meant that rather than needing to degrade to a `case` statement when being pushed down through a `RepartionExec` (which would still be the case in #23817 I think), there are a few cases where dynamic filters would be able to instead re-map themselves using these mappings, and to remain partitioned. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
