saadtajwar commented on issue #22788: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/22788#issuecomment-5023316681
> > Hey [@gene-bordegaray](https://github.com/gene-bordegaray) ! Took a cursory look through this and the Substrait docs - it looks like this Range repartitioning isn't currently supported by the existing [Substrait exchange types](https://substrait.io/relations/physical_relations/#exchange-types) - is the recommended approach here to use the "advanced extension" field to create our own Datafusion-specific serialization, or propose an addition upstream to Substrait itself? Happy to help in either case! > > any update on this? [@saadtajwar](https://github.com/saadtajwar) Hey @Rich-T-kid - sorry I haven't had a chance to follow back up on this - I'm happy to do a quick look into the process for supporting a new Substrait exchange type vs using the advanced extensions if that would be helpful for us to decide the path forward here! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
