adriangb commented on issue #23376: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/23376#issuecomment-4971959191
> > Just to clarify, what we mean by implement dynamic filtering generally is implement for across operators for non-hash partitioned plans? AFAIK for hash partitioned plans we have implemented dynamic filters generally for many operators. Hash join implementations in particular has several problems / open issues, but they are implemented. > > This is in the context of range partitioning specifically. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we generate `CASE range` expressions like we do for `CASE hash`. Indeed we don't and the proposal makes sense. I just wanted to confirm because it wasn't 100% clear just reading through. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
