MohamedAbdeen21 commented on code in PR #11186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11186#discussion_r1667413972
##########
datafusion/sql/tests/cases/plan_to_sql.rs:
##########
@@ -314,3 +310,78 @@ fn test_table_references_in_plan_to_sql() {
"SELECT \"table\".id, \"table\".\"value\" FROM \"table\"",
);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_pretty_roundtrip() -> Result<()> {
+ let schema = Schema::new(vec![
+ Field::new("id", DataType::Utf8, false),
+ Field::new("age", DataType::Utf8, false),
+ ]);
+
+ let df_schema = DFSchema::try_from(schema)?;
+
+ let context = MockContextProvider::default();
+ let sql_to_rel = SqlToRel::new(&context);
+
+ let unparser = Unparser::default();
+
+ let sql_to_pretty_unparse = vec![
+ ("((id < 5) OR (age = 8))", "id < 5 OR age = 8"),
+ ("((id + 5) * (age * 8))", "(id + 5) * age * 8"),
+ ("(3 + (5 * 6) * 3)", "3 + 5 * 6 * 3"),
+ ("((3 * (5 + 6)) * 3)", "3 * (5 + 6) * 3"),
+ ("((3 AND (5 OR 6)) * 3)", "(3 AND (5 OR 6)) * 3"),
+ ("((3 + (5 + 6)) * 3)", "(3 + 5 + 6) * 3"),
+ ("((3 + (5 + 6)) + 3)", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ ("3 + 5 + 6 + 3", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ ("3 + (5 + (6 + 3))", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ ("3 + ((5 + 6) + 3)", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ ("(3 + 5) + (6 + 3)", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ ("((3 + 5) + (6 + 3))", "3 + 5 + 6 + 3"),
+ (
+ "((id > 10) OR (age BETWEEN 10 AND 20))",
+ "id > 10 OR age BETWEEN 10 AND 20",
+ ),
+ (
+ "((id > 10) * (age BETWEEN 10 AND 20))",
+ "(id > 10) * (age BETWEEN 10 AND 20)",
+ ),
+ ("id - (age - 8)", "id - (age - 8)"),
+ ("((id - age) - 8)", "id - age - 8"),
+ ("(id OR (age - 8))", "id OR age - 8"),
+ ("(id / (age - 8))", "id / (age - 8)"),
+ ("((id / age) * 8)", "id / age * 8"),
+ ("((age + 10) < 20) IS TRUE", "(age + 10 < 20) IS TRUE"),
+ (
+ "(20 > (age + 5)) IS NOT FALSE",
+ "(20 > age + 5) IS NOT FALSE",
+ ),
+ ("(true AND false) IS FALSE", "(true AND false) IS FALSE"),
+ ("true AND (false IS FALSE)", "true AND false IS FALSE"),
+ ];
+
+ for (sql, pretty) in sql_to_pretty_unparse.iter() {
+ let sql_expr = Parser::new(&GenericDialect {})
+ .try_with_sql(sql)?
+ .parse_expr()?;
+ let expr =
+ sql_to_rel.sql_to_expr(sql_expr, &df_schema, &mut
PlannerContext::new())?;
+ let round_trip_sql = unparser.expr_to_sql(&expr)?.to_string();
+ assert_eq!(pretty.to_string(), round_trip_sql);
+
+ // verify that the pretty string parses to the same underlying Expr
+ let pretty_sql_expr = Parser::new(&GenericDialect {})
+ .try_with_sql(pretty)?
+ .parse_expr()?;
+
+ let pretty_expr = sql_to_rel.sql_to_expr(
+ pretty_sql_expr,
+ &df_schema,
+ &mut PlannerContext::new(),
+ )?;
+
+ assert_eq!(expr.to_string(), pretty_expr.to_string());
Review Comment:
I can see the pros and cons of each approach and to be honest that's part of
why I wanted to keep the original `expr_to_sql` and add a new method instead.
I believe we can keep the parse tree structure if that's more important
(haven't tried that yet); but again, as you've noted, that may not be very
human-friendly. So it's up to the people who use the unparser the most to
decide.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
