On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:10:12PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote: > > I think that's orthogonal. I just mean that using zero for success puts > > you in our usual style, and then accumulating errors can be done with > > "|=". > > Ah. I guess I was misguided by the way errors are currently handled > in `apply_filter` (success = 1; failure = 0): > https://github.com/git/git/blob/8c6d1f9807c67532e7fb545a944b064faff0f70b/convert.c#L437-L479 > > I wouldn't like if the different filter protocols would use different > error exit codes. Would it be OK to adjust the existing `apply_filter` > function in a cleanup patch?
Ah, I see. I think those return codes are a little different. They are not "success or error", but "did convert or did not convert" (or "would convert" when no buffer is given). And unless the filter is required, we quietly turn errors into "did not convert" (and if it is, we die()). So I'm not sure if changing them is a good idea. I agree with you that it's probably inviting confusion to have the two sets of filter functions have opposite return codes. So I think I retract my suggestion. :) -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
