Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > >>>> - Even if we did not read from any existing marks file, if we are >>>> given export_marks_file that names an existing file, wouldn't we >>>> want to avoid corrupting it with a dump from this aborted run? >>> >>> If we don't run from an existing marks file, this patch has no effect. >> >> Yes, that is exactly what I was wondering if we may want to improve >> while at it. > > This doesn't make much sense. Corrupted from where? This patch is > tackling the issue where the imported marks file is "corrupted".
s/corrupted/overwritten by garbage/ is what I really meant, but in any case, I do not think there is any valid use case that relied on the current behaviour that will be broken by this update. I do not think a script that used separate import and export marks files (and used mv to rename the exported one to the import used by the next round, only after seeing fast-import successfully exits) would be harmed, as a non-zero status is still a non-exit status and it wouldn't have moved a corrupt export file to the next import, for example. Other people and real users of fast-import might find cases I couldn't think of that this change negatively affects, but that's expected for any change and that's why we cook any changes in 'pu' and then 'next'. So let's queue this as a strict improvement. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
