On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> - Even if we did not read from any existing marks file, if we are >>> given export_marks_file that names an existing file, wouldn't we >>> want to avoid corrupting it with a dump from this aborted run? >> >> If we don't run from an existing marks file, this patch has no effect. > > Yes, that is exactly what I was wondering if we may want to improve > while at it. This doesn't make much sense. Corrupted from where? This patch is tackling the issue where the imported marks file is "corrupted". -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
