On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Instead of putting everything in under the same attribute name >>> "label", make one attribute per label? Would this work? >>> >>> *.[ch] c-group code-group >>> >>> And the pathspec magic name can be simply "attr", any git attribute >>> can be used with it, e.g. :(attr:c-group) >> >> So you want to be able to query something like: >> >> git ls-files ":(crlf=auto)" >> >> as well? > > It would be more like > > git ls-files ":(attr:crlf=auto)" > > It certainly sounds tempting, even though I do not want to keep what > this initial chunk of the series needs to do to the minimum.
This is another case for using ':' instead of '='. So I think ':' is better for this future enhancement. Also this future enhancement may ask for git ls-files ":(attr:label=foo)" or git ls-files ":(attr:-label)" so the user can circumvent the warn and ignore strategy. :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html