On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > >> (e.g. work tree for working tree?) > > This was probably primarily my fault, not just because I've written > more than my share of documentation (compared to the code that > touched), but I was deliberately writing "work tree" when both "work > tree" and "working tree" terms meant the same thing. Compared to > the length of the timeperiod, the newcomer who is now known as > "worktree" has only lived a very short period of time, so it is not > surprising to see remaining "work tree" in our documentation set.
Sure. > > I think some attempts like 06cdac5a (git-reset.txt: use "working > tree" consistently, 2010-09-15) were made to clean things up even > before "worktree" started to mean an entirely different thing, and > we shouldn't make things worse by adding mentions of "work tree" > when we mean "working tree". Ok. I'll see if I can send a similar patch like that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
