> You had some good measurements in the coverletter, which is not going to be 
> recorded in the projects history. This part however would be part of the 
> commit.
> So you could move the speed improvements here (as well as the other 
> reasoning) on why this is a good idea. :)

I considered that, but I thought it would inflate the size of the commit 
message quite a bit and represents a  pretty temporary information as I'm 
planning to port more code. Any further progression on this would make the old 
meassurements kind of obsolete IMHO. I decided to move it to the coverletter, 
because it is only valid information if you consider both commits. If the 
general opinion on here is that I should add it to the commit message though, 
I'll gladly update it.

>> https://github.com/git/git/pull/191
>
> Oh I see you're using the pull-request to email translator, cool! 

Yes, I did. It definitly makes things easier if you are not used to mailing 
lists, but it was also a bit of a kerfuffle. I tried to start working on 
coverletter support, but I couldn't get it to accept the amazon SES credentials 
I provided. I ended up manually submiting the coverletter. It also didn't like 
my name.

Thank you for your quick feedback. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to