Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@imag.fr> writes:

> The char buf[40] is safe (at least while the strings are not
> translated), but I'd rather avoid magic numbers like this 40 in the
> code, and use a construct that does not have this size limitation.
> Especially if it makes the code shorter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@imag.fr>
> ---

The construct being fixed with this change looks very similar to
Peff's a5e03bf5 (ref-filter: drop sprintf and strcpy calls,
2015-09-24) on jk/war-on-sprintf topic, but the new code since that
commit cleaned up.

I'd expect that this will be rolled into Karthik's series in the
next reroll?  

Looking good.  Thanks.

>  ref-filter.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 6044eb0..7932c21 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -1116,7 +1116,6 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
>                                strcmp(formatp, "trackshort") &&
>                                (starts_with(name, "upstream") ||
>                                 starts_with(name, "push"))) {
> -                             char buf[40];
>                               unsigned int nobracket = 0;
>  
>                               if (!strcmp(valp, ",nobracket"))
> @@ -1135,24 +1134,21 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
>                                       v->s = "";
>                               else if (!num_ours) {
>                                       if (nobracket)
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "behind %d", 
> num_theirs);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("behind %d", 
> num_theirs);
>                                       else
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "[behind %d]", 
> num_theirs);
> -                                     v->s = xstrdup(buf);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("[behind %d]", 
> num_theirs);
>                               } else if (!num_theirs) {
>                                       if (nobracket)
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "ahead %d", 
> num_ours);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("ahead %d", 
> num_ours);
>                                       else
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d]", 
> num_ours);
> -                                     v->s = xstrdup(buf);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d]", 
> num_ours);
>                               } else {
>                                       if (nobracket)
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "ahead %d, behind 
> %d",
> -                                                     num_ours, num_theirs);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("ahead %d, 
> behind %d",
> +                                                            num_ours, 
> num_theirs);
>                                       else
> -                                             sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d, behind 
> %d]",
> -                                             num_ours, num_theirs);
> -                                     v->s = xstrdup(buf);
> +                                             v->s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d, 
> behind %d]",
> +                                                            num_ours, 
> num_theirs);
>                               }
>                               continue;
>                       } else if (!strcmp(formatp, "trackshort") &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to