From: Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
Older versions of pack-refs did not write peel lines for
refs outside of refs/tags. This meant that on reading the
pack-refs file, we might set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for
such a ref, even though we do not know anything about its
peeled value.
The previous commit updated the writer to always peel, no
matter what the ref is. That means that packed-refs files
written by newer versions of git are fine to be read by both
old and new versions of git. However, we still have the
problem of reading packed-refs files written by older
versions of git, or by other implementations which have not
yet learned the same trick.
The simplest fix would be to always unset the
REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for refs outside of refs/tags that do
not have a peel line (if it has a peel line, we know it is
valid, but we cannot assume a missing peel line means
anything). But that loses an important optimization, as
upload-pack should not need to load the object pointed to by
refs/heads/foo to determine that it is not a tag.
Instead, we add a "fully-peeled" trait to the packed-refs
file. If it is set, we know that we can trust a missing peel
line to mean that a ref cannot be peeled. Otherwise, we fall
back to assuming nothing.
[commit message and tests by Jeff King <p...@peff.net>]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
This uses Michael's approach for managing the flags within
read_packed_refs, which is more readable. As I picked up his
code and comments, I realized that there was basically
nothing of mine left, so I switched the authorship. But do
note:
1. It should have Michael's signoff, which was not present
in the commit I lifted the code from.
2. I tweaked the big comment above read_packed_refs to
reduce some ambiguities. Please double-check that I am
not putting inaccurate words in your mouth. :)
pack-refs.c | 2 +-
refs.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
t/t3211-peel-ref.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pack-refs.c b/pack-refs.c
index ebde785..4461f71 100644
--- a/pack-refs.c
+++ b/pack-refs.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int pack_refs(unsigned int flags)
die_errno("unable to create ref-pack file structure");
/* perhaps other traits later as well */
- fprintf(cbdata.refs_file, "# pack-refs with: peeled \n");
+ fprintf(cbdata.refs_file, "# pack-refs with: peeled fully-peeled \n");
for_each_ref(handle_one_ref, &cbdata);
if (ferror(cbdata.refs_file))
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 175b9fc..bdeac28 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -803,11 +803,39 @@ static void read_packed_refs(FILE *f, struct ref_dir *dir)
return line;
}
+/*
+ * Read f, which is a packed-refs file, into dir.
+ *
+ * A comment line of the form "# pack-refs with: " may contain zero or
+ * more traits. We interpret the traits as follows:
+ *
+ * No traits:
+ *
+ * Probably no references are peeled. But if the file contains a
+ * peeled value for a reference, we will use it.
+ *
+ * peeled:
+ *
+ * References under "refs/tags/", if they *can* be peeled, *are*
+ * peeled in this file. References outside of "refs/tags/" are
+ * probably not peeled even if they could have been, but if we find
+ * a peeled value for such a reference we will use it.
+ *
+ * fully-peeled:
+ *
+ * All references in the file that can be peeled are peeled.
+ * Inversely (and this is more important, any references in the
+ * file for which no peeled value is recorded is not peelable. This
+ * trait should typically be written alongside "fully-peeled" for
+ * compatibility with older clients, but we do not require it
+ * (i.e., "peeled" is a no-op if "fully-peeled" is set).
+ */
static void read_packed_refs(FILE *f, struct ref_dir *dir)
{
struct ref_entry *last = NULL;
char refline[PATH_MAX];
int flag = REF_ISPACKED;
+ int refs_tags_peeled = 0;
while (fgets(refline, sizeof(refline), f)) {
unsigned char sha1[20];
@@ -816,8 +844,10 @@ static void read_packed_refs(FILE *f, struct ref_dir *dir)
if (!strncmp(refline, header, sizeof(header)-1)) {
const char *traits = refline + sizeof(header) - 1;
- if (strstr(traits, " peeled "))
+ if (strstr(traits, " fully-peeled "))
flag |= REF_KNOWS_PEELED;
+ else if (strstr(traits, " peeled "))
+ refs_tags_peeled = 1;
/* perhaps other traits later as well */
continue;
}
@@ -825,6 +855,8 @@ static void read_packed_refs(FILE *f, struct ref_dir *dir)
refname = parse_ref_line(refline, sha1);
if (refname) {
last = create_ref_entry(refname, sha1, flag, 1);
+ if (refs_tags_peeled && !prefixcmp(refname,
"refs/tags/"))
+ last->flag |= REF_KNOWS_PEELED;
add_ref(dir, last);
continue;
}
@@ -832,8 +864,15 @@ static void read_packed_refs(FILE *f, struct ref_dir *dir)
refline[0] == '^' &&
strlen(refline) == 42 &&
refline[41] == '\n' &&
- !get_sha1_hex(refline + 1, sha1))
+ !get_sha1_hex(refline + 1, sha1)) {
hashcpy(last->u.value.peeled, sha1);
+ /*
+ * Regardless of what the file header said,
+ * we definitely know the value of *this*
+ * reference:
+ */
+ last->flag |= REF_KNOWS_PEELED;
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/t/t3211-peel-ref.sh b/t/t3211-peel-ref.sh
index 85f09be..d4d7792 100755
--- a/t/t3211-peel-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t3211-peel-ref.sh
@@ -39,4 +39,26 @@ test_expect_success 'refs are peeled outside of refs/tags
(packed)' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'create old-style pack-refs without fully-peeled' '
+ # Git no longer writes without fully-peeled, so we just write our own
+ # from scratch; we could also munge the existing file to remove the
+ # fully-peeled bits, but that seems even more prone to failure,
+ # especially if the format ever changes again. At least this way we
+ # know we are emulating exactly what an older git would have written.
+ {
+ echo "# pack-refs with: peeled " &&
+ print_ref "refs/heads/master" &&
+ print_ref "refs/outside/foo" &&
+ print_ref "refs/tags/base" &&
+ print_ref "refs/tags/foo" &&
+ echo "^$(git rev-parse "refs/tags/foo^{}")"
+ } >tmp &&
+ mv tmp .git/packed-refs
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'refs are peeled outside of refs/tags (old packed)' '
+ git show-ref -d >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
test_done
--
1.8.2.rc2.7.gef06216
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
