On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 03:06:22PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > refname = parse_ref_line(refline, sha1);
> > if (refname) {
> > - last = create_ref_entry(refname, sha1, flag, 1);
> > + /*
> > + * Older git did not write peel lines for anything
> > + * outside of refs/tags/; if the fully-peeled trait
> > + * is not set, we are dealing with such an older
> > + * git and cannot assume an omitted peel value
> > + * means the ref is not a tag object.
> > + */
> > + int this_flag = flag;
> > + if (!fully_peeled && prefixcmp(refname, "refs/tags/"))
> > + this_flag &= ~REF_KNOWS_PEELED;
> > +
> > + last = create_ref_entry(refname, sha1, this_flag, 1);
> > add_ref(dir, last);
> > continue;
> > }
>
> I have to admit that I am partial to my variant of this code [1] because
> the logic makes it clearer when the affirmative decision can be made to
> set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag. But this version also looks correct to
> me and equivalent (aside from the idea that a few lines later if a
> peeled value is found then the REF_KNOWS_PEELED bit could also be set).
Yeah, I think they are equivalent, but I agree yours is a little more
readable. I'll switch it in my re-roll, and I will go ahead and set the
REF_KNOWS_PEELED bit when we see a peel line. That code should not be
triggered in general, but it is the sane thing for the reader to do, so
it makes the code more obvious and readable.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
