On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> >     ++<<<<<<< ours
> >      +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
> >      +{
> >      +      ssize_t ret, done = 0;
> >      +
> >      +retry:
> >      +      ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
> >      +      if (ret < 0)
> >      +              return ret;
> >      +
> >      +      done += ret;
> >      +
> >      +      if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
> >      +              return done;
> >      +      else
> >      +              goto retry;
> >      +}
> >      +
> >     ++||||||| base
> >     ++=======
> >     + #include "common.h"
> >     + 
> >     ++>>>>>>> theirs
> >       int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> >       {
> >             int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
> > 
> > This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
> > exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
> > recorded for the first conflict here.
> > 
> > Sounds sensible?
> 
> Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
> conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
> ||||| line.
I only did git checkout --conflict=diff3 after the merge conflict
happend. So I cannot confirm that git already does it.

So here is a reproduction receipe:

        git clone git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git
        cd mtd-utils
        git checkout ca39eb1
        wget -O patch1 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45779/raw
        wget -O patch2 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45591/raw
        for p in patch1 patch2; do perl -p -i -e 'print "From tralala Mon Sep 
17 00:00:00 2001\n" if $. == 1' $p; done
        git am patch1
        git am -3 patch2 # first merge conflict
        perl -n -i -e 's/=======//; print unless /^[<>]{7} /;' 
flash_otp_write.c # resolve
        git add flash_otp_write.c
        git am --resolved
        git rebase -i ca39eb1 # swap order of the two patches

results in

        $ git ls-files -u
        100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 1       
flash_otp_write.c
        100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 2       
flash_otp_write.c
        100644 31b963e2d6cf0016ca542529886e1ee71a22664e 3       
flash_otp_write.c

and resolving yields:

        $ git ls-files -s flash_otp_write.c
        100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 0       
flash_otp_write.c

Then
        git rebase --continue 

gives the 2nd rebase conflict:

        $ git ls-files -u
        100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 1       
flash_otp_write.c
        100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 2       
flash_otp_write.c
        100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 3       
flash_otp_write.c

Now knowing from the previous resolution that with base=f360a3e0
(= origin + patch1) merging

        d407ebbf (= origin) and
        31b963e2 (= origin + patch1 + patch2)

gives 648e0422 (origin + patch2),
git could know that with base=d407ebbf (origin) merging 648e0422 (origin
+ patch1) and f360a3e0 (origin + patch1) gives 31b963e2 (origin + patch1
+ patch2) again.

And git doesn't prepare 31b963e2 in flash_otp_write.c for me.

@Johannes, do you have some non-standard setting, or can you reproduce?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to