Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> ++<<<<<<< ours
> +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + ssize_t ret, done = 0;
> +
> +retry:
> + ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + done += ret;
> +
> + if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
> + return done;
> + else
> + goto retry;
> +}
> +
> ++||||||| base
> ++=======
> + #include "common.h"
> +
> ++>>>>>>> theirs
> int main(int argc,char *argv[])
> {
> int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
>
> This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
> exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
> recorded for the first conflict here.
>
> Sounds sensible?
Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
||||| line.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
