On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:18:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Denton Liu <liu.den...@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > While we're at it, perform some major cleanup of t4014 including some
> > stylistic cleanup and also, unmasking of Git return codes.
> 
> Wow.  It seems that "while we're at it" grew quite large and (from
> purely patch count's point of view) ends up appearing as if it were
> the primary focus of the series ;-)

For housekeeping, since this patchset now exists as two branches
(dl/format-patch-cover-letter-subject and
dl/format-patch-doc-test-cleanup), would you prefer any new revisions
exist as one big patchset or two separate patchsets targeting each
individual branch?

> 
> Thanks for tackling the age-old mess.  Admittedly, this particular
> script is from the older parts of Git's history and a clean-up was
> long overdue.
> 
> With the "split pipes" approach taken in patches 09 and 10, we'd end
> up leaving more untracked and unignored cruft in the working tree. I
> do not think they would cause problems with the existing tests after
> reading the patches over.
> 
> 

Reply via email to