Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> writes: > Ooh, if you're going to open this door, then a proposal I assumed > would be shot down but which I'd be just about as happy with is: > > * Remove git-filter-branch from git.git. Mention in the release > notes where people can go to get it.[1] > ...
Yup, I think, especially given now filter-repo exists and is well known by Git users, this is a good move in the mid to longer term. > For as long as git-filter-branch is part of git.git and other tools > are outside, people will take that as a strong endorsement from us for > filter-branch and use it regardless of how much other education > exists...and that causes problems. Exactly.
