Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes: > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] stash: pass pathspec as pointer > > Passing the pathspec by value is potentially confusing, as the copy is > only a shallow copy, so save the overhead of the copy, and pass the > pathspec struct as a pointer. > > In addition use copy_pathspec to copy the pathspec into > rev.prune_data, so the copy is a proper deep copy, and owned by the > revision API, as that's what the API expects.
It does make quite a lot of sense, but do we need clear_pathspec() at strategic places after we are done using these copied instances?
