Jeff King <[email protected]> writes:
> +static void write_meta_header(struct metapack_writer *mw, const char *id,
> + uint32_t version)
> +{
> + version = htonl(version);
> +
> + sha1write(mw->out, "META", 4);
> + sha1write(mw->out, "\0\0\0\1", 4);
> + sha1write(mw->out, mw->pack->sha1, 20);
> + sha1write(mw->out, id, 4);
> + sha1write(mw->out, &version, 4);
> +}
It seems that you are very close to actually having a plumbing that
could also do the pack .idx files. Until/unless that can be done, I
am not sure how much benefit we would be getting from a file format
that records a subtype "id" and a generic "META" type, instead of
just a single "id" as the type ehader. But it is OK to use 8 extra
bytes if we can potentially gain something later.
Shouldn't id be validated with at least something like
if (strlen(id) < 3)
die("Bad id: %s", id);
to catch a call
write_meta_header(&mw, "me", 47);
that will stuff 'm', 'e', NUL and the garbage the compiler/linker
combo has placed after that constant string in the 4-byte id field?
> +void metapack_writer_init(struct metapack_writer *mw,
> + const char *pack_idx,
> + const char *name,
> + int version)
> +{
> + struct strbuf path = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + memset(mw, 0, sizeof(*mw));
> +
> + mw->pack = add_packed_git(pack_idx, strlen(pack_idx), 1);
> + if (!mw->pack || open_pack_index(mw->pack))
> + die("unable to open packfile '%s'", pack_idx);
> +
> + strbuf_addstr(&path, pack_idx);
> + strbuf_chompstr(&path, ".idx");
> + strbuf_addch(&path, '.');
> + strbuf_addstr(&path, name);
Your chompstr() does not even validate if the given name ends with
".idx", so this sounds like a glorified way to say
strbuf_splice(&path, path->len - strlen("idx"), strlen("idx"),
name, strlen(name));
to me.
> + mw->path = strbuf_detach(&path, NULL);
> +
> + mw->out = create_meta_tmp();
> + write_meta_header(mw, name, version);
> +}
> +
> +void metapack_writer_finish(struct metapack_writer *mw)
> +{
> + const char *tmp = mw->out->name;
> +
> + sha1close(mw->out, NULL, CSUM_FSYNC);
> + if (rename(tmp, mw->path))
> + die_errno("unable to rename temporary metapack file");
Who is responsible for running adjust_shared_perm()? The caller, or
this function?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
