On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:13:05 -0800
Brandon Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> Introduce the transport-helper capability 'stateless-connect'. This
> capability indicates that the transport-helper can be requested to run
> the 'stateless-connect' command which should attempt to make a
> stateless connection with a remote end. Once established, the
> connection can be used by the git client to communicate with
> the remote end natively in a stateless-rpc manner as supported by
> protocol v2. This means that the client must send everything the server
> needs in a single request as the client must not assume any
> state-storing on the part of the server or transport.
Maybe it's worth mentioning that support in the actual remote helpers
will be added in a subsequent patch.
> If a stateless connection cannot be established then the remote-helper
> will respond in the same manner as the 'connect' command indicating that
> the client should fallback to using the dumb remote-helper commands.
This makes sense, but there doesn't seem to be any code in this patch
that implements this.
> @@ -612,6 +615,11 @@ static int process_connect_service(struct transport
> *transport,
> if (data->connect) {
> strbuf_addf(&cmdbuf, "connect %s\n", name);
> ret = run_connect(transport, &cmdbuf);
> + } else if (data->stateless_connect) {
> + strbuf_addf(&cmdbuf, "stateless-connect %s\n", name);
> + ret = run_connect(transport, &cmdbuf);
> + if (ret)
> + transport->stateless_rpc = 1;
Why is process_connect_service() falling back to stateless_connect if
connect doesn't work? I don't think this fallback would work, as a
client that needs "connect" might need its full capabilities.
