On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> An alternative might be to add a "phoney" bit next to "used" in the >>> cache_tree structure, mark the cache tree as phoney when we skip an >>> entry marked as CE_REMOVE or CE_ITA, and make the postprocessing >>> loop this patch adds aware of that bit, instead of iterating over >>> the index entries; instead, it would recurse the resulting cache >>> tree and invalidate parts of the tree that have subtrees with the >>> "phoney" bit set, or something. >> >> Yeah, that sounds better. > > Did anything happen to this topic after this?
Not from my side because I forgot to mark this thread as a todo item and unsurprisingly forgot about it. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
