Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: >> An alternative might be to add a "phoney" bit next to "used" in the >> cache_tree structure, mark the cache tree as phoney when we skip an >> entry marked as CE_REMOVE or CE_ITA, and make the postprocessing >> loop this patch adds aware of that bit, instead of iterating over >> the index entries; instead, it would recurse the resulting cache >> tree and invalidate parts of the tree that have subtrees with the >> "phoney" bit set, or something. > > Yeah, that sounds better.
Did anything happen to this topic after this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
