On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> That squash looks good to me. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> That is not a particulary helpful comment, by the way. I can help >>> topics by contributors by queuing emergency fix at the tip to make >>> ones that do not build correctly buildable and testable (which is >>> what the "SQUASH???" commits are about), but I'd rather not see me >>> forced to find among 19 commits which one is broken and needs the >>> hotfix squashed in myself. >> >> I'm happy to change what I'm doing to be more helpful, but it's not >> clear to me from this & the context what that would be. >> >> * I sent a v4 that had this bug in <[email protected]> >> * You pointed out that initialization bug in response >> * I sent a v5 of just that patch (not the rest of the series) in >> response to that in <[email protected]> >> * You replied in <[email protected]> in a >> reply I (probably mis-)read as "no worries, I'll just squash the fix >> in" > > Sorry, I completely forgot about our exchange around your v5. If > your comment were "squash is good but you've seen a replacement sent > as v5 that is not there yet", I wouldn't have made such a silly > comment, but given that I've already responded to your v5 saying > I'll handle it, that is asking too much from you. > > What I pushed out a few hours ago should already have the fix in. > Thanks for clarifying the situation, and sorry again.
Okey, no worries. Was just a bit confused & wondering if I could make something easier for you in the future.
