Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> writes: >>> That squash looks good to me. >> >> Thanks. >> >> That is not a particulary helpful comment, by the way. I can help >> topics by contributors by queuing emergency fix at the tip to make >> ones that do not build correctly buildable and testable (which is >> what the "SQUASH???" commits are about), but I'd rather not see me >> forced to find among 19 commits which one is broken and needs the >> hotfix squashed in myself. > > I'm happy to change what I'm doing to be more helpful, but it's not > clear to me from this & the context what that would be. > > * I sent a v4 that had this bug in <[email protected]> > * You pointed out that initialization bug in response > * I sent a v5 of just that patch (not the rest of the series) in > response to that in <[email protected]> > * You replied in <[email protected]> in a > reply I (probably mis-)read as "no worries, I'll just squash the fix > in"
Sorry, I completely forgot about our exchange around your v5. If your comment were "squash is good but you've seen a replacement sent as v5 that is not there yet", I wouldn't have made such a silly comment, but given that I've already responded to your v5 saying I'll handle it, that is asking too much from you. What I pushed out a few hours ago should already have the fix in. Thanks for clarifying the situation, and sorry again.
