Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > While it may be true that you can have bare worktrees; I would question > why anyone wants to do this, as the only thing it provides is an > additional HEAD (plus its reflog).
A more plausible situation is you start with a bare one as the primary and used to make local clones to do your work in the world before "git worktree". It would be a natural extension to your workflow to instead create worktrees of of that bare one as the primary worktree with secondaries with working trees.
