Hi,
Stefan Beller wrote:
> Add the flag --show-superproject-working-tree to git-rev-parse
> to make it easy to find out if there is a superproject. When no
> superproject exists, the output will be empty.
I'm a little late for this, but think it's better to comment late than
never.
After this patch, git rev-parse has two options relating to the working
tree:
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree
Is this inconsistency necessary? Now that there is a "git worktree"
command that allows making a second working tree for the same
repository, I would have thought we had standardized on work tree as
the name in UI.
Thoughts?
Jonathan
