Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> Aside from scaling better, this means that the submodule name needn't be
> stored in the ref_store instance anymore (which will be changed in a
> moment).
Nice. I like the latter reason very much (this is not a suggestion
to change the description).
> +struct submodule_hash_entry
> +{
> + struct hashmap_entry ent; /* must be the first member! */
> +
> + struct ref_store *refs;
> +
> + /* NUL-terminated name of submodule: */
> + char submodule[FLEX_ARRAY];
> +};
> +
> +static int submodule_hash_cmp(const void *entry, const void *entry_or_key,
> + const void *keydata)
> +{
> + const struct submodule_hash_entry *e1 = entry, *e2 = entry_or_key;
> + const char *submodule = keydata;
> +
> + return strcmp(e1->submodule, submodule ? submodule : e2->submodule);
I would have found it more readable if it were like so:
const char *submodule = keydata ? keydata : e2->submodule;
return strcmp(e1->submodule, submodule);
but I suspect the difference is not that huge.
> +}
> +
> +static struct submodule_hash_entry *alloc_submodule_hash_entry(
> + const char *submodule, struct ref_store *refs)
> +{
> + size_t len = strlen(submodule);
> + struct submodule_hash_entry *entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry) + len + 1);
I think this (and the later memcpy) is what FLEX_ALLOC_MEM() was
invented for.
> + hashmap_entry_init(entry, strhash(submodule));
> + entry->refs = refs;
> + memcpy(entry->submodule, submodule, len + 1);
> + return entry;
> +}
> ...
> @@ -1373,16 +1405,17 @@ void base_ref_store_init(struct ref_store *refs,
> die("BUG: main_ref_store initialized twice");
>
> refs->submodule = "";
> - refs->next = NULL;
> main_ref_store = refs;
> } else {
> - if (lookup_ref_store(submodule))
> + refs->submodule = xstrdup(submodule);
> +
> + if (!submodule_ref_stores.tablesize)
> + hashmap_init(&submodule_ref_stores, submodule_hash_cmp,
> 20);
Makes me wonder what "20" stands for. Perhaps the caller should be
allowed to say "I do not quite care what initial size is" by passing
0 or some equally but more clealy meaningless value (which of course
would be outside the scope of this series).
