On 2017-01-10 01:58, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:40:30PM -0500, Richard Hansen wrote:

Document that a relative pathname for diff.orderFile is interpreted as
relative to the top-level work directory.

Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <hans...@google.com>
---
 Documentation/diff-config.txt | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/diff-config.txt b/Documentation/diff-config.txt
index 58f4bd6af..875212045 100644
--- a/Documentation/diff-config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/diff-config.txt
@@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ diff.noprefix::
 diff.orderFile::
        File indicating how to order files within a diff, using
        one shell glob pattern per line.
+       If `diff.orderFile` is a relative pathname, it is treated as
+       relative to the top of the work tree.
        Can be overridden by the '-O' option to linkgit:git-diff[1].

What happens in a bare repository?

I didn't know which is why this patch is silent on that topic.  :)


I'm guessing it's relative to the top-level of the repository,

I just tried it out and it's relative to $PWD.

but we should probably spell it out.

Do we want it to be relative to $PWD? I think relative to $GIT_DIR is more useful. If we want it to be relative to $GIT_DIR, then I think we should stay silent regarding bare repositories so that the behavior remains unspecified until we update the logic.


The other case is --no-index when we are not in a repository at all, but
that should just be relative to the current directory,

It is.

which isn't really worth mentioning.

Agreed.

I'll post a re-roll if people prefer the current behavior over relative to $GIT_DIR.

Thanks for reviewing,
Richard


-Peff

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to