Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:

>>  While I think it would make it easier for people to experiment and
>>  build on if the topic is merged to 'next', I am at the same time a
>>  bit reluctant to merge an unproven new topic that introduces a new
>>  file format, which we may end up having to support til the end of
>>  time.  It is likely that to support a "prime clone from CDN", it
>>  would need a lot more than just "these are the heads and the pack
>>  data is over there", so this may not be sufficient.
>> 
>>  Will discard.
>
> You could mark it as experimental, subject to change, and merge it to
> `next` safely.

Are you planning, or do you know somebody who plans to use that code
soonish?  Otherwise I'd prefer to drop it---at this point, the series
is merely "just because we can", not "because we need it to further
improve this or that".

Reply via email to