Hi Junio, On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jc/bundle (2016-03-03) 6 commits > - index-pack: --clone-bundle option > - Merge branch 'jc/index-pack' into jc/bundle > - bundle v3: the beginning > - bundle: keep a copy of bundle file name in the in-core bundle header > - bundle: plug resource leak > - bundle doc: 'verify' is not about verifying the bundle > > The beginning of "split bundle", which could be one of the > ingredients to allow "git clone" traffic off of the core server > network to CDN. > > While I think it would make it easier for people to experiment and > build on if the topic is merged to 'next', I am at the same time a > bit reluctant to merge an unproven new topic that introduces a new > file format, which we may end up having to support til the end of > time. It is likely that to support a "prime clone from CDN", it > would need a lot more than just "these are the heads and the pack > data is over there", so this may not be sufficient. > > Will discard. You could mark it as experimental, subject to change, and merge it to `next` safely. Ciao, Dscho
