On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> wrote: > So if we now mix things up just to avoid one more configuration > option, we could very well make things harder to develop, to > configure, to parse and to understand later, so it is not a trade off > worth making.
OK since we're still in the early phase of determining how to re-split, I guess going with elaborate, precise configuration is better, even if it's more config options. Once we know better, maybe we can decide a good default cover-all "auto" then (or maybe not because we find out no shoe fits all). -- Duy
