Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:

> Dennis Kaarsemaker <den...@kaarsemaker.net> writes:
>
>> OK, so here it is as a proper patch.

Here is what I queued.  Duy, what do you think?  It seems OK to me.

Thanks.

-- >8 --
From: Dennis Kaarsemaker <den...@kaarsemaker.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:41:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] worktree: allow the main brach of a bare repository to be
 checked out

In bare repositories, get_worktrees() still returns the main repository,
so git worktree list can show it. ignore it in find_shared_symref so we
can still check out the main branch.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <den...@kaarsemaker.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
---
 t/t2025-worktree-add.sh | 8 ++++++++
 worktree.c              | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh b/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
index 4bcc335a19..b618d6be21 100755
--- a/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
+++ b/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
@@ -138,6 +138,14 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout from a bare repo without 
"add"' '
        )
 '
 
+test_expect_success '"add" default branch of a bare repo' '
+       (
+               git clone --bare . bare2 &&
+               cd bare2 &&
+               git worktree add ../there3 master
+       )
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'checkout with grafts' '
        test_when_finished rm .git/info/grafts &&
        test_commit abc &&
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
index 5acfe4cd64..f7869f8d60 100644
--- a/worktree.c
+++ b/worktree.c
@@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ const struct worktree *find_shared_symref(const char 
*symref,
 
        for (i = 0; worktrees[i]; i++) {
                struct worktree *wt = worktrees[i];
+               if (wt->is_bare)
+                       continue;
 
                if (wt->is_detached && !strcmp(symref, "HEAD")) {
                        if (is_worktree_being_rebased(wt, target)) {
-- 
2.10.1-591-g271c03b70f

Reply via email to