Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: >> I am personally fine with this line; two things come to mind: >> >> - This would work just fine as-is with Linus's change to turn >> DEFAULT_ABBREV to -1. >> >> - It appears that it is more fashionable to use >> strbuf_add_unique_abbrev() these days. > > Right, I actually looked at this place when I tried to decide where I > could use that function. Somehow I thought I'd not break up the flow here. > > But since you asked so nicely,...
When I say "I am fine", I am not asking you to change anything. Some of the places that have been updated recently to use strbuf_add_unique_abbrev() in other topics did improve the readability of the code, but I do not think it would universally be true.
